Er (Ambion) immediately after collection. Subjects were treated post-KT with triple immunosuppressant therapy consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. An additional group of KT patients (n = 18) with CNI sparing treatment, normal histology and graft function with allograft biopsies collected after 2 years post-KT was included as a control. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (20). Centralized histological evaluation was performed by two blinded pathologists using Banff 07 classification (6). Patients with other causes of late decline in eGFR, (e.g., BK viral nephropathy, original disease recurrence, post-transplant diabetes) were not included in the study to avoid potential confounders. CNI-related nephrotoxicity was defined as a histological evidence of CNIT in absence of acute rejection (AR) and/or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and IF/TA (when not described as associated with CNIT); and rise in serum creatinine Leupeptin (hemisulfate)MedChemExpress Leupeptin (hemisulfate) resulting in a lowering of the CNI dose. Specifically, CNIT was histologically defined as isometric vacuolization of the proximal convoluted tubules or nodular hyalinization of arterioles or small arteries, involving the muscular wall (6). Validation and training sets A total of 121 allograft biopsies (n=73), training set; n=48, validation set) were evaluated using microarrays and real time quantitative-PCR (RT-qPCR), respectively. BIM-22493 biological activity Tissue biopsy samples with histological proven CNIT (n=14), AR (n=13, 8 acute cellular rejection (ACR) and 5 antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), CAD with IF/TA (IF/TA, n=10) and normal allografts (NA, n=18) were selected for analysis. A mixed set of ACR and AMR was used to eliminate possible pathways associated with graft rejection. NA samples were selected from protocol biopsies collected at 24 months post-KT (patients on long-term CNIimmunosuppression (average=22?.5 months post-KT), with normal histology and eGFR from transplant to time of collection was consistently 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Additionally, NA patients had no reported CNIT or AR events prior to the time of the biopsy. Aiming to validate the specificity of the resulting CNIT-molecular signature for posterior evaluation of contribution to CAD, the independent validation set included 16 CNIT, 16 IF/TA, and 16 NA biopsy samples (Supplemental Methods). Furthermore, to evaluate the specificity of the signature to CNI-induced renal nephrotoxicity, a set of 18 allograft biopsies from unique KT recipients with NA function (mean post-KT= 41.1 ?15.8 months) undergoing a CNI sparing immunosuppressive protocol (sirolimus) was used.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAm J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Maluf et al.PageEvaluation of CNIT contribution in an independent prospective cohortAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptA set of samples was selected from protocol biopsies collected at 3- and 12-months posttransplantation from 61 patients (122 biopsies). The same set of NA biopsies used in the CNIT signature establishment was also used for the comparison analysis in the longitudinal study. First, the 61 patients were classified depending on graft function at 24-months postKT. Specifically, graft function was assessed using estimated eGFR, based on recommendations from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (21) and National Kidney Disease Education Prog.Er (Ambion) immediately after collection. Subjects were treated post-KT with triple immunosuppressant therapy consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. An additional group of KT patients (n = 18) with CNI sparing treatment, normal histology and graft function with allograft biopsies collected after 2 years post-KT was included as a control. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (20). Centralized histological evaluation was performed by two blinded pathologists using Banff 07 classification (6). Patients with other causes of late decline in eGFR, (e.g., BK viral nephropathy, original disease recurrence, post-transplant diabetes) were not included in the study to avoid potential confounders. CNI-related nephrotoxicity was defined as a histological evidence of CNIT in absence of acute rejection (AR) and/or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and IF/TA (when not described as associated with CNIT); and rise in serum creatinine resulting in a lowering of the CNI dose. Specifically, CNIT was histologically defined as isometric vacuolization of the proximal convoluted tubules or nodular hyalinization of arterioles or small arteries, involving the muscular wall (6). Validation and training sets A total of 121 allograft biopsies (n=73), training set; n=48, validation set) were evaluated using microarrays and real time quantitative-PCR (RT-qPCR), respectively. Tissue biopsy samples with histological proven CNIT (n=14), AR (n=13, 8 acute cellular rejection (ACR) and 5 antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), CAD with IF/TA (IF/TA, n=10) and normal allografts (NA, n=18) were selected for analysis. A mixed set of ACR and AMR was used to eliminate possible pathways associated with graft rejection. NA samples were selected from protocol biopsies collected at 24 months post-KT (patients on long-term CNIimmunosuppression (average=22?.5 months post-KT), with normal histology and eGFR from transplant to time of collection was consistently 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Additionally, NA patients had no reported CNIT or AR events prior to the time of the biopsy. Aiming to validate the specificity of the resulting CNIT-molecular signature for posterior evaluation of contribution to CAD, the independent validation set included 16 CNIT, 16 IF/TA, and 16 NA biopsy samples (Supplemental Methods). Furthermore, to evaluate the specificity of the signature to CNI-induced renal nephrotoxicity, a set of 18 allograft biopsies from unique KT recipients with NA function (mean post-KT= 41.1 ?15.8 months) undergoing a CNI sparing immunosuppressive protocol (sirolimus) was used.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAm J Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 May 01.Maluf et al.PageEvaluation of CNIT contribution in an independent prospective cohortAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptA set of samples was selected from protocol biopsies collected at 3- and 12-months posttransplantation from 61 patients (122 biopsies). The same set of NA biopsies used in the CNIT signature establishment was also used for the comparison analysis in the longitudinal study. First, the 61 patients were classified depending on graft function at 24-months postKT. Specifically, graft function was assessed using estimated eGFR, based on recommendations from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (21) and National Kidney Disease Education Prog.
Posted inUncategorized