S Food Intake in MiceTo verify that central administration of NPY

S Food Intake in MiceTo verify that central administration of NPY stimulates food intake, both basal and NPY-induced food intake were assessed during two hours, starting at 09:00 a.m. with all mice serving as their own control. Administration of NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) in the left lateral ventricle (LV) increased food intake during the first hour after injection by +164 (0.3460.19 vs 0.9060.40 g, p,0.001, Fig. 1). Food intake during the second hour after injection was similar to the basal food intake in this specific time frame (0.4060.17 vs 0.4960.20 g, n.s., Fig. 1).Figure 1. NPY administration into the lateral ventricle acutely increases food intake. NPY (0.2 mg/kg) was administered in the left lateral ventricle under light isoflurane anaesthesia, and food intake was measured for two hours, starting at 09:00 a.m. All animals served as their own controls (basal food intake). Values are means 6 SD (n = 9), ***p,0.001 compared to basal. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055217.gFigure 2. NPY administration into the lateral ventricle does not affect 4 IBP Hepatic VLDL production in anesthetized mice. After a 4 hour fast, mice were fully anesthetized and hepatic VLDL production was assessed. Mice received an i.v. injection of Tran35S label (t = 230 min), followed by an injection of tyloxapol (t = 0 min), directly followed by an LV injection of NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (control). Plasma triglyceride (TG) levels were determined at indicated time points (A). VLDL-TG production rate was calculated from the slopes of the individual TG-time graphs (B). At t = 120 min, mice were exsanguinated and VLDL fractions were isolated from serum by ultracentrifugation. 35S-apoB production was determined by scintillation counting of the isolated VLDL fraction (C). 18055761 Values are means 6 SD (n = 8210). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055217.gCentral NPY and Hepatic VLDL Production in Micebetween the VLDL-TG production rate in controls (6.260.5 mmol/h) and that in mice treated with NPY (6.960.1, 6.260.1, 6.960.3, 6.860.5 or 6.960.5 mmol/h at 0.0002, 0.002, 0.02, 0.2 or 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively, n.s., Fig. S1). Since the use of anesthetics theoretically could interfere with the modulation of central NPY signaling, we repeated the experiment in conscious mice. However, NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) did not increase hepatic VLDL-TG or VLDL-apoB production in conscious mice (data not shown).Antagonizing Central NPY Signaling does not Affect Hepatic VLDL ProductionSince other modulators of NPY signaling have previously been shown to acutely interfere with VLDL-TG production in rats [12], we next assessed the effects of PYY3?6 and of GR231118, a synthetic Y1 receptor antagonist, on hepatic VLDL-TG and VLDL-apoB production. Central administration of GR231118 did not affect the hepatic production of VLDL-TG (8.661.8 vs 8.761.4 mmol/h, n.s., Fig. 3A,B) or VLDL-apoB (55611 vs 5969 6103 dpm/h, n.s., Fig. 3C). In line with this finding, intravenous administration of PYY3?6, the endogenous ML240 antagonist of NPY, was also ineffective in lowering the hepatic production of VLDLTG (8.560.9 vs 7.560.9 mmol/h, n.s., Fig. 3D,E) and VLDLapoB (73618 vs 756136103 dpm/h, n.s., Fig. 3F).Third Ventricle NPY Administration Stimulates Food Intake in MiceIn contrast to the LV, the third ventricle (3V) is located at the base of the hypothalamus, the brain area that mediates NPYinduced feeding. To exclude that the absence of effect of modulation of central NPY signaling was due to LV versus 3V injecti.S Food Intake in MiceTo verify that central administration of NPY stimulates food intake, both basal and NPY-induced food intake were assessed during two hours, starting at 09:00 a.m. with all mice serving as their own control. Administration of NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) in the left lateral ventricle (LV) increased food intake during the first hour after injection by +164 (0.3460.19 vs 0.9060.40 g, p,0.001, Fig. 1). Food intake during the second hour after injection was similar to the basal food intake in this specific time frame (0.4060.17 vs 0.4960.20 g, n.s., Fig. 1).Figure 1. NPY administration into the lateral ventricle acutely increases food intake. NPY (0.2 mg/kg) was administered in the left lateral ventricle under light isoflurane anaesthesia, and food intake was measured for two hours, starting at 09:00 a.m. All animals served as their own controls (basal food intake). Values are means 6 SD (n = 9), ***p,0.001 compared to basal. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055217.gFigure 2. NPY administration into the lateral ventricle does not affect hepatic VLDL production in anesthetized mice. After a 4 hour fast, mice were fully anesthetized and hepatic VLDL production was assessed. Mice received an i.v. injection of Tran35S label (t = 230 min), followed by an injection of tyloxapol (t = 0 min), directly followed by an LV injection of NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (control). Plasma triglyceride (TG) levels were determined at indicated time points (A). VLDL-TG production rate was calculated from the slopes of the individual TG-time graphs (B). At t = 120 min, mice were exsanguinated and VLDL fractions were isolated from serum by ultracentrifugation. 35S-apoB production was determined by scintillation counting of the isolated VLDL fraction (C). 18055761 Values are means 6 SD (n = 8210). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055217.gCentral NPY and Hepatic VLDL Production in Micebetween the VLDL-TG production rate in controls (6.260.5 mmol/h) and that in mice treated with NPY (6.960.1, 6.260.1, 6.960.3, 6.860.5 or 6.960.5 mmol/h at 0.0002, 0.002, 0.02, 0.2 or 2.0 mg/kg BW, respectively, n.s., Fig. S1). Since the use of anesthetics theoretically could interfere with the modulation of central NPY signaling, we repeated the experiment in conscious mice. However, NPY (0.2 mg/kg BW) did not increase hepatic VLDL-TG or VLDL-apoB production in conscious mice (data not shown).Antagonizing Central NPY Signaling does not Affect Hepatic VLDL ProductionSince other modulators of NPY signaling have previously been shown to acutely interfere with VLDL-TG production in rats [12], we next assessed the effects of PYY3?6 and of GR231118, a synthetic Y1 receptor antagonist, on hepatic VLDL-TG and VLDL-apoB production. Central administration of GR231118 did not affect the hepatic production of VLDL-TG (8.661.8 vs 8.761.4 mmol/h, n.s., Fig. 3A,B) or VLDL-apoB (55611 vs 5969 6103 dpm/h, n.s., Fig. 3C). In line with this finding, intravenous administration of PYY3?6, the endogenous antagonist of NPY, was also ineffective in lowering the hepatic production of VLDLTG (8.560.9 vs 7.560.9 mmol/h, n.s., Fig. 3D,E) and VLDLapoB (73618 vs 756136103 dpm/h, n.s., Fig. 3F).Third Ventricle NPY Administration Stimulates Food Intake in MiceIn contrast to the LV, the third ventricle (3V) is located at the base of the hypothalamus, the brain area that mediates NPYinduced feeding. To exclude that the absence of effect of modulation of central NPY signaling was due to LV versus 3V injecti.