Table 1. Summary statistics of physicochemical indicators of Marvdasht groundwater. of 16WHO
Table 1. Summary statistics of physicochemical indicators of Marvdasht groundwater. of 16WHO (2017) Table 1. Summary statistics of physicochemical6.9 indicators of Marvdasht groundwater. pH 7.53 eight.0 0.2 2.eight 7.5.5 EC S/cm 4801.two 50.5 14,649.0 2635.1 127.1 WHO 1500 Parameter Unit Imply Min Max SD CV (2017) 1000 TDS mg/L 2400.7 347.2 7979.2 2823.0 117.1 pH 7.five.5 500 TH mg/L 7.531153.two 6.9 199.six eight.0 5480.4 0.two 1364.52.8 121.1 EC HCO3- /cm mg/L 4801.2309.1 50.five one hundred.014,649.0 552.1 2635.1 89.6 127.1 29.4 1500 300 TDS mg/L 2400.7 347.two 7979.2 2823.0 117.1 1000 SO 2- mg/L mg/L 1153.2301.five 199.6 13.2 5480.4 1501.61364.five 377.3121.1 125.two 500 200 TH four HCO3 – mg/L 29.4 150.5 300 Cl- mg/L 309.1941.6 100.0 13.five 552.15117.7 89.six 1418.1 200 mg/L 301.five 13.two 1501.six 377.3 125.2 200 SO4 2-2 Ca mg/L 217.1 52.0 838.six 235.1 108.2 75 Cl- mg/L 941.6 13.5 5117.7 1418.1 150.five 200 two Mg2 mg/L 217.1148.1 52.0 11.six 838.six 836.5 235.1 187.4108.two 128.2 75 30 mg/L Ca 2 mg/L Mg K mg/L 148.1 7.four 11.six 0.5 836.five 32.0 187.four 0.8 128.two 51 30 12 K mg/L 7.four 0.five 32.0 0.8 51 12 Na mg/L 398.6 six.0 2200.4 548.8 137.7 200 Parameter Unit Imply Min Max SD CVpH: acidity;EC: electrical conductivity; TDS: total dissolved solids; TA: total alkalinity; TH: total (TA), TH: total EC: electrical conductivity; TDS: total dissolved solids; total alkalinity hardness; pH: acidity; – : bicarbonate; SO 2- : sulfate; Cl- chloride; Ca chloride; Ca2: calcium; Mg2 NLRP3 Proteins Storage & Stability magnesium; hardness; HCO3-: bicarbonate; SO42-:: sulfate; Cl-: 2 : calcium; Mg2 : magnesium; :K : potassium; K: HCO3 four Na : sodium. potassium; Na: sodium.Na mg/L 398.6 six.0 2200.4 548.eight 137.7Figure three. Total sum of cations (TSC) versus total of and and anions Figure three. Total sum of cations (TSC) versus total sumsum of anions (TSA).(TSA).The steps performed to calculate the drinking groundwater excellent index are the methods performed to calculate the drinking groundwater quality index are Ubiquitin-Specific Peptidase 35 Proteins site prepresented below: sented below: (I) The weight of every groundwater excellent indicator (Gwi) was determined as follows: The (I) The of groundwater indicators variedquality indicatorWeights was determined as folweight weight of every single groundwater between 1 and 5. (Gwi) 1 and 5 belonged for the least and most productive indicators of groundwater high quality, and 5. Weights The lows: The weight of groundwater indicators varied involving 1respectively [32]. 1 and 5 berelative weight (GWr) was calculated as follows: longed towards the least and most powerful indicators of groundwater top quality, respectively [32].two.five. Drinking Groundwater Index (DGWQI)two.five. Drinking Groundwater Index (DGWQI)The relative weight (GWr) was calculated as follows: GwiGwr =Gwi Gwi Gwr =n i=(four)ii =1 exactly where Gwi was the weight of every single groundwater high-quality indicator and Gwi was the sumGwn(4)nnof the weight with the n indicators. exactly where Gwi was theratio (qi) for each groundwater high-quality indicator and (II) The high-quality weight of a single indicator was determined as follows:Gwi was thesum with the weight from the n indicators. Ci qi = one hundred (5) DSi (II) The top quality ratio (qi) for a single indicator was determined as follows:Water 2021, 13,six ofwhere qi was the high quality ratio, Ci was the amount of indicator (mg/L), and DSi was the WHO typical for the indicator, the ideal value was Cio = 0. (III) The drinking groundwater high-quality index (DGWQI) was calculated as follows: DGWQI =GWr qi(six)exactly where GWr was relative weight and qi was the excellent ratio. 2.6. DGWQI Sensitivity Evaluation Sensitivity analysis was utilised to figure out one of the most (or le.
Posted inUncategorized