Ween two sexes at every time-window primarily based on metabolite-by-sex interaction termWeen two sexes at

Ween two sexes at every time-window primarily based on metabolite-by-sex interaction term
Ween two sexes at every time-window primarily based on metabolite-by-sex interaction term FDR (Panel B), RP101988 Agonist Figure S7: Time-window precise analysis–sensitivity evaluation additional adjusted for birthweight: Variety of considerable metabolites at each and every time-window primarily based on LRT FDR (Panel A), number of metabolites which have considerably unique effects involving two sexes at every single timewindow primarily based on metabolite-by-sex interaction term FDR (Panel B), Figure S8: Time-window particular analysis–sensitivity evaluation further adjusted for birthweight: Heatmap of cord metabolites’ effect size for females (Panel A) and males (Panel B) on BMI masked by non-significance, Table S1: Longitudinal PSB-603 Antagonist trajectory evaluation: Associations of all 376 person cord metabolites with child BMI trajectory groups (early-OWO, late-OWO and NW-B as when compared with NW-A) from multinomial logistic regression model benefits, Table S2: Longitudinal trajectory analysis: Color assignment for cord metabolites modules, Table S3: Longitudinal trajectory evaluation: Associations of person cord metabolites inside every important module (as identified in Table 2 with p-value 0.05 for either comparison) with kid BMI trajectory groups (early-OWO and late-OWO as when compared with NW) from multinomial logistic regression model final results, Table S4: Longitudinal trajectory evaluation: Associations of all 376 person cord metabolites with youngster BMI trajectory groups (early-OWO and late-OWO as compared to NW-A) from multinomial logistic regression model benefits, Table S5: Longitudinal trajectory analysis–sensitivity evaluation: Associations of cord metabolite modules (as defined primarily based on correlation between metabolite pairs) with child BMI trajectory groups (early-OWO and lateOWO as in comparison with NW) from multinomial logistic regression model benefits with interaction term in between sex and metabolite modules, Table S6: Longitudinal trajectory analysis–sensitivity evaluation: Associations of individual cord metabolites inside each and every significant module (as identified in Table 2 with p-value 0.05 for either comparison) with kid BMI trajectory groups (early-OWO and late-Metabolites 2021, 11,17 ofOWO as in comparison with NW) from multinomial logistic regression model benefits with an interaction term amongst sex and metabolite intensity, Table S7: Time-window particular evaluation: Summary of time-window precise linear regression models’ outcomes for BMI, Table S8: Time-window distinct evaluation: Summary of time-window particular linear regression models’ results for BMI, Table S9: Time-window specific analysis – sensitivity analysis further adjusted for cesarean section: Summary of time-window precise linear regression models’ benefits for BMI, Table S10: Time-window precise analysis–sensitivity evaluation additional adjusted for breastfeeding: Summary of time-window distinct linear regression models’ results for BMI, Table S11: Time-window specific analysis–sensitivity analysis further adjusted for birthweight: Summary of time-window certain linear regression models’ benefits for BMI. Author Contributions: T.C.: conceptualization, formal evaluation, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing–original draft; J.Z.: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology; X.H.: data curation, supervision, writing–review and editing; G.W.: methodology, writing–review and editing; F.B.H.: methodology, writing–review and editing; X.W.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, writing–review and editing; L.L.: conc.