Verhead than LECAR because it will not share the buffer occupancy in slightly reduced QL-IX-55 Formula overhead than LECAR since it does not share the buffer occupancy in reduce overhead than LECAR mainly because itproduces share the buffer overhead mainly because it it formation. In addition, LARODLoDiS produces the next highest occupancy information. formation. Moreover, LARODLoDiS does not the next highest overhead for the reason that Moreover, LAROD-LoDiS produces the next highest overhead since it shares the location shares the location info but in a briefer form. Spray and Wait generates moderate shares the location data but in a briefer type. Spray and Wait generates moderate data but in a briefer form. Spray and Wait generates moderate overhead. Lastly, overhead. Finally, GPSR and GPSRQ generate the lowest overhead following the previ overhead. Lastly, GPSR and GPSRQ produce the lowest overhead following the previ GPSR and GPSR-Q generate the lowest overhead following the previous benefits. ous benefits. ous outcomes.60 60 55 55 50 50 4560Overhead (MB) Overhead (MB)35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 ten ten 5 five 0Overhead (MB) Overhead (MB)40LECAR LECAR LER LAROD-LoDis LAROD-LoDis Spray and Wait and Wait GPSR GPSR-Q GPSR-Q55 55 50 50 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 10 5LECAR LECAR LER LER LAROD-LoDis LAROD-LoDis Spray Wait Spray andand Wait GPSR GPSR GPSR-Q GPSR-Q15 ten 55 10 15 20 25510Number of UAVs(a) Buffer Size = 25 MB (a) Buffer Size = 25 MBthe buffer size is (a) 25 MB and (b) 50 MB. the buffer size is (a) 25 MB and (b) 50 MB.Quantity of UAVs15 20 Number of UAVs(b) Buffer Size = 50 MBNumber of UAVs(b) Buffer Size = 50 MBFigure 16. Performance comparison of the deemed routing protocols concerning overhead when Figure 16. Functionality comparison in the viewed as routing protocols with regards to overhead when Figure 16. Efficiency comparison of your regarded as routing protocols concerning overhead when the buffer size is (a) 25 MB and (b) 50 MB.Sensors 2021, 21,Sensors 2021, 21, x FOR PEER REVIEW17 of18 of5.7. Efficiency Evaluation for Consumed Power five.7. Overall performance Evaluation for Consumed Energy We recorded all transmissions (information and overhead) inside the simulation experiments We recorded all transmissions (data and overhead) in the simulation experiments and calculated the total consumed power through the experiments (Figure 17). We consider and calculated the total consumed power in the Penicolinate A supplier course of the experiments (Figure 17). We con both data data and overhead for appropriate evaluation from the performance concerning energysider each and overhead for correct evaluation of the overall performance concerning en efficiency. In DTN primarily based method, it can be frequent that various copies of information packets ergyefficiency. In DTN primarily based method, it can be widespread that several copies of information packets can exist inside the network that typically result in in depth transmissions consuming significant can exist within the network that normally trigger in depth transmissions consuming significant energy. We can observe from Figure 17, GPRS and GPRSQ consume the lowest energy. power. We are able to observe from Figure 17, GPRS and GPRS-Q consume the lowest energy. As explained earlier, GPSR and GPSRQ usually fail to forward the packet for the location As explained earlier, GPSR and GPSR-Q often fail to forward the packet towards the destination due to a lack of a proper mechanism to adapt in a sparsely populated network scenario. on account of a lack of a proper mechanism to adapt in a sparsel.
Posted inUncategorized