Atistic 7.27 7.85 8.47 10.34 4.60 3.ROI ?Ensartinib supplier regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aSinger et al. (2004); bBorg et al (2006); cGreene et al. (2001).Table 5 Video event of Real PvG contrasted to Imagine PvG (Real PvG Video > Imagine PvG video)Region Right TPJ Left TPJ Right anterior insula Right anterior insula Left anterior insula Left anterior insula Mid cingulate A priori ROIs Right anterior buy Ensartinib insulaa Right anterior insulaa Right anterior insulaa 60 39 42 52 ?2 50 38 ?8 ?3 8 Peak MNI coordinates ?8 ?8 18 24 12 20 32 MNI coordinates 15 12 27 3 3 ? 4 4 10 ? ?8 ? 44 z value 5.15 5.34 4.60 4.05 3.54 3.00 3.38 t-statistic 5.72 4.53 4.ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aHassabis et al. (2007); bGreene et al. (2001).Table 3 Decide event of Real PvG contrasted to Imagine PvG (Real PvG Decide > Imagine Decide)Region Left TPJ Right TPJ dlPFC SMA Left amygdala Right amygdala ACC Thalmus/STA region Right anterior insula A priori ROIs Left TPJa Right TPJa Right amygdalab Left amygdalab ?3 50 28 ?0 ?4 46 54 46 ?0 26 16 10 28 Peak MNI coordinates ?4 ?8 22 ?8 10 10 40 ?2 32 MNI coordinates ?1 ?5 ? ? 6 9 ?6 ?6 0 2 6 62 ?8 ?8 26 10 ? z value 6.58 6.44 4.62 4.19 4.15 4.11 3.98 3.97 3.23 t-statistic 10.34 10.43 4.85 3.ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous study; aSinger et al. (2004).well-documented proposal that the anterior insula codes for the empathic experience of another's pain (Singer et al., 2004) and suggests that participants experienced greater socio-affective engagement in the Real version of the task. Self-interested vs pro-social behavior One strength of the use of multiple trials in the PvG task is that it gives Deciders the option to either maintain a purely black (keep ?0; maximize shocks) or white (keep ?; remove shocks) moral stance, or to position themselves somewhere within the moral `gray area' (? < keep < ?0). This not only has ecological validity, reflecting people's tendency to qualify moral decisions but also allows us to investigate brain regions associated with different shades of `moral gray.' We therefore conducted a parametric regression analysis and found that increasingly self-interested behavior on the Real PvG task (when Deciders kept more money, parametrically weighted on a scale from 1 to 6) was associated with increased activity in the dorsal ACC (dACC), bilateral dlPFC and orbital frontal cortex (OFC; Figure 3A;ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aBorg et al. (2006); bAkitsuki and Decety (2009).socio-affective engagement with the task. Accordingly, we compared neural activation during the Video feed event (Figure 1B) and predicted greater anterior insula activation indexing empathy for pain (Singer et al., 2004) in the Real PvG when compared with the Imagine PvG. As we expected, a comparison analysis of the Video event for the Real vs Imagine PvG (Table 5) revealed greater bilateral anterior insula activation when participants watched real administrations of painful stimulations. This further supports theSCAN (2012)O. Feldman Hall et al.Fig. 3 Dissociable networks for real selfish and pro-social moral decisions (A) Parametric regression analysis (trial-by-trial) of the Decide event of the Real PvG for increasingly selfish behaviors (gre.Atistic 7.27 7.85 8.47 10.34 4.60 3.ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aSinger et al. (2004); bBorg et al (2006); cGreene et al. (2001).Table 5 Video event of Real PvG contrasted to Imagine PvG (Real PvG Video > Imagine PvG video)Region Right TPJ Left TPJ Right anterior insula Right anterior insula Left anterior insula Left anterior insula Mid cingulate A priori ROIs Right anterior insulaa Right anterior insulaa Right anterior insulaa 60 39 42 52 ?2 50 38 ?8 ?3 8 Peak MNI coordinates ?8 ?8 18 24 12 20 32 MNI coordinates 15 12 27 3 3 ? 4 4 10 ? ?8 ? 44 z value 5.15 5.34 4.60 4.05 3.54 3.00 3.38 t-statistic 5.72 4.53 4.ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aHassabis et al. (2007); bGreene et al. (2001).Table 3 Decide event of Real PvG contrasted to Imagine PvG (Real PvG Decide > Imagine Decide)Region Left TPJ Right TPJ dlPFC SMA Left amygdala Right amygdala ACC Thalmus/STA region Right anterior insula A priori ROIs Left TPJa Right TPJa Right amygdalab Left amygdalab ?3 50 28 ?0 ?4 46 54 46 ?0 26 16 10 28 Peak MNI coordinates ?4 ?8 22 ?8 10 10 40 ?2 32 MNI coordinates ?1 ?5 ? ? 6 9 ?6 ?6 0 2 6 62 ?8 ?8 26 10 ? z value 6.58 6.44 4.62 4.19 4.15 4.11 3.98 3.97 3.23 t-statistic 10.34 10.43 4.85 3.ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous study; aSinger et al. (2004).well-documented proposal that the anterior insula codes for the empathic experience of another's pain (Singer et al., 2004) and suggests that participants experienced greater socio-affective engagement in the Real version of the task. Self-interested vs pro-social behavior One strength of the use of multiple trials in the PvG task is that it gives Deciders the option to either maintain a purely black (keep ?0; maximize shocks) or white (keep ?; remove shocks) moral stance, or to position themselves somewhere within the moral `gray area' (? < keep < ?0). This not only has ecological validity, reflecting people's tendency to qualify moral decisions but also allows us to investigate brain regions associated with different shades of `moral gray.' We therefore conducted a parametric regression analysis and found that increasingly self-interested behavior on the Real PvG task (when Deciders kept more money, parametrically weighted on a scale from 1 to 6) was associated with increased activity in the dorsal ACC (dACC), bilateral dlPFC and orbital frontal cortex (OFC; Figure 3A;ROI ?regions of interest corrected at P < 0.05 FWE using a priori independent coordinates from previous studies: aBorg et al. (2006); bAkitsuki and Decety (2009).socio-affective engagement with the task. Accordingly, we compared neural activation during the Video feed event (Figure 1B) and predicted greater anterior insula activation indexing empathy for pain (Singer et al., 2004) in the Real PvG when compared with the Imagine PvG. As we expected, a comparison analysis of the Video event for the Real vs Imagine PvG (Table 5) revealed greater bilateral anterior insula activation when participants watched real administrations of painful stimulations. This further supports theSCAN (2012)O. Feldman Hall et al.Fig. 3 Dissociable networks for real selfish and pro-social moral decisions (A) Parametric regression analysis (trial-by-trial) of the Decide event of the Real PvG for increasingly selfish behaviors (gre.
Posted inUncategorized