Uorescence (Figure 2) and soluble expression level (Figure S1A) with GFPnt

Uorescence (Figure 2) and soluble expression level (Figure S1A) with GFPnt, indicating that the 1418741-86-2 mutations did not affect the GFP folding and activity significantly as expected. As next step, we attempted to replace the remaining three internal Met residues (M78, M88, and M218) of GFPnt-r2M in the core hydrophobic region with other amino acids. Actually it was reported that the three Met residues can be mutated into other residues without affecting significantly the fluorescence of cells expressing the GFP variant (GFPrm_AM), in which M78, M88, and M218 were changed into Leu, Phe, and Ala respectively [12]. Therefore, we introduced the three mutations into GFPnt-r2M, but the fluorescence of cells expressing the GFP variant (M78L, M88F, M153T, M218A, and M233K) was much lower than that of cells expressing GFPnt-r2M. Since different GFP sequences were used as template to generate GFPrm_AM and the Met-free GFP in this study, we decided to change the three Met residues of GFPnt-r2M step by step. The M218 residue that plays an important role in folding [23] was randomized into hydrophobic amino acids (Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, and Ala) using oligonucleotides having degenerate codons. The clones showing fluorescence were selected manually based on their fluorescence, and a GFPnt-r2M variant having the M218A mutation, designated as GFPnt-r3M, showed the highest fluorescent among the mutants obtained. The whole cell fluorescence of the GFPnt-r3M was approximatelyRenaturation Pentagastrin site Equilibrium MeasurementEach purified GFP variant (100 mM) was denatured at 95uC for 5 min in 9 M urea in TNG buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.2 M NaCl, 5 Glycerol, 1 mM DTT). Equilibrium fluorescence values were measured by diluting the urea denatured proteins into refolding buffer (TNG) containing 5 mM 18055761 DTT to various final concentration of urea (1? M), and allowing the refolding to proceed up to 24 h at 15uC. Fluorescence was measured by exciting at 485 15755315 nm and emission at 515 nm with excitation/emission slits of 5.0 nm and was recorded on Perkin Elmer/Wallac Victor 2 Multilabel Counter (1420-011). C0.5 was calculated by measuring the concentration of urea at which the 50 of initial fluorescence was recovered after 24 h of incubation, and the values were determined by sigmoidal fit using sigma plot (Systat Software Inc., CA) [19].Protein-protein ConjugationCopper (I)-catalyzed cycloaddition reaction between Hpg incorporated GFPhs-r5M and Aha incorporated GFPhs-r5M was performed in a reaction mixture composed of 0.5 mg/ml of each protein (250 ml), 50 mM Tris.HCl pH 8 (100 ml), 50 mM CuSO4 (50 ml), 50 mM L-ascorbic acid (50 ml), and H2O (300 ml). Control was prepared in similar way without the addition of CuSO4 and L-ascorbic acid. The reaction mixture was shaken forIn Vivo N-Terminal Functionalization of ProteinFigure 2. Comparison of functional productivity of GFPnt and its variants. The data show the whole cell fluorescences of GFPnt (containing all the 5 internal Met), GFPnt-r2M (containing M153T and M233K mutations), GFPnt-r3M (containing M153T, M233K and M218A mutations), GFPnt-r4M (M78I, M88L, M153T and M233K mutations), GFPnt-r5M (M78I, M88L, M153T, M218A and M233K mutation) and GFPhs-r5M (GFPnt-r5M containing mutations for folding enhancement). The relative fluorescence (in arbitrary units) is the fluorescence of whole cells compared with the fluorescence of cells expressing GFPnt. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046741.gtimes lower than that of GFPnt-r2M (Figure 2). SDS-PAGE analy.Uorescence (Figure 2) and soluble expression level (Figure S1A) with GFPnt, indicating that the mutations did not affect the GFP folding and activity significantly as expected. As next step, we attempted to replace the remaining three internal Met residues (M78, M88, and M218) of GFPnt-r2M in the core hydrophobic region with other amino acids. Actually it was reported that the three Met residues can be mutated into other residues without affecting significantly the fluorescence of cells expressing the GFP variant (GFPrm_AM), in which M78, M88, and M218 were changed into Leu, Phe, and Ala respectively [12]. Therefore, we introduced the three mutations into GFPnt-r2M, but the fluorescence of cells expressing the GFP variant (M78L, M88F, M153T, M218A, and M233K) was much lower than that of cells expressing GFPnt-r2M. Since different GFP sequences were used as template to generate GFPrm_AM and the Met-free GFP in this study, we decided to change the three Met residues of GFPnt-r2M step by step. The M218 residue that plays an important role in folding [23] was randomized into hydrophobic amino acids (Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, and Ala) using oligonucleotides having degenerate codons. The clones showing fluorescence were selected manually based on their fluorescence, and a GFPnt-r2M variant having the M218A mutation, designated as GFPnt-r3M, showed the highest fluorescent among the mutants obtained. The whole cell fluorescence of the GFPnt-r3M was approximatelyRenaturation Equilibrium MeasurementEach purified GFP variant (100 mM) was denatured at 95uC for 5 min in 9 M urea in TNG buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.2 M NaCl, 5 Glycerol, 1 mM DTT). Equilibrium fluorescence values were measured by diluting the urea denatured proteins into refolding buffer (TNG) containing 5 mM 18055761 DTT to various final concentration of urea (1? M), and allowing the refolding to proceed up to 24 h at 15uC. Fluorescence was measured by exciting at 485 15755315 nm and emission at 515 nm with excitation/emission slits of 5.0 nm and was recorded on Perkin Elmer/Wallac Victor 2 Multilabel Counter (1420-011). C0.5 was calculated by measuring the concentration of urea at which the 50 of initial fluorescence was recovered after 24 h of incubation, and the values were determined by sigmoidal fit using sigma plot (Systat Software Inc., CA) [19].Protein-protein ConjugationCopper (I)-catalyzed cycloaddition reaction between Hpg incorporated GFPhs-r5M and Aha incorporated GFPhs-r5M was performed in a reaction mixture composed of 0.5 mg/ml of each protein (250 ml), 50 mM Tris.HCl pH 8 (100 ml), 50 mM CuSO4 (50 ml), 50 mM L-ascorbic acid (50 ml), and H2O (300 ml). Control was prepared in similar way without the addition of CuSO4 and L-ascorbic acid. The reaction mixture was shaken forIn Vivo N-Terminal Functionalization of ProteinFigure 2. Comparison of functional productivity of GFPnt and its variants. The data show the whole cell fluorescences of GFPnt (containing all the 5 internal Met), GFPnt-r2M (containing M153T and M233K mutations), GFPnt-r3M (containing M153T, M233K and M218A mutations), GFPnt-r4M (M78I, M88L, M153T and M233K mutations), GFPnt-r5M (M78I, M88L, M153T, M218A and M233K mutation) and GFPhs-r5M (GFPnt-r5M containing mutations for folding enhancement). The relative fluorescence (in arbitrary units) is the fluorescence of whole cells compared with the fluorescence of cells expressing GFPnt. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046741.gtimes lower than that of GFPnt-r2M (Figure 2). SDS-PAGE analy.